HS450 Unit 8 Assignment – Ethics and Decision-Making in the VA Healthcare System
Course OutcomeHS450-5: Evaluate the impact of ethical decision-making on healthcare leadership to maximize strategic planning
Unit Outcomes Discuss the principles of ethics and medical professionalism in strategic planning. Examine the role of leaders in ethical decision-making and problem solving strategies in the U.S. health system.GEL-7.7: Analyze the effects of ethical decision making on the field of study.
Unit 8 Assignment
Case Study: Problems at the VA Health System
In 2009, President Barack Obama appointed Eric Sinseki as the secretary of Veterans Affairs (VA), the U.S. department responsible for providing healthcare and federal benefits to U.S. veterans and dependents. Secretary Shinseki was charged with 16 initiatives to bring the VA into the 21st Century. One of the 16 initiatives was to enhance veterans’ experience with and access to healthcare.
In 2013, CNN was among the news outlets reporting that veterans were experiencing delayed care at the Williams Jennings Bryan Dorn Veterans Medical Center in Columbia SC. In fact, the delays were so serious that six veterans died while waiting for months to receive necessary diagnostic procedures. The VA launched an investigation into the GO clinic at Dorn and found several issues, including low staff census; leadership turnover that resulted in a lack of understanding of roles, responsibilities and system processes; and program coordination. Allegations of long wait times also emerged about VA facilities in Arizona, Pittsburgh, and Phoenix VA Health Care Systems. Delays, however, were not the only issues in the VA facilities. In the Phoenix VA Health Care System, for instance, there were claims of manipulated patient wait times, bad scheduling practices, and patient deaths.
In 2014, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) launched an investigation into these allegations.Two questions were addressed in this review:1. Did the facility’s electronic wait list (EWL purposely omit the names of veterans waiting forcare and, if so, at whose direction?2. Were the deaths of any of these veterans related to delays in care?
The investigators confirmed “inappropriate scheduling issues throughout the VA and health care system.The OIG report concluded as follows (VA 2014, iii).In Phoenix VA, specifically, investigators found that 1,400 veterans did not have a primary care appointmentbut were listed on the EWL and that 1,700 veterans were waiting for a primary care appoint but were not listedon the EWL. Because veterans were not on the EWLS, the Phoenix leadership significantly understated the time new patients waited for the appointments. The investigators found that the average wait time was 115 days for the first primary care appointment and about 84 percent of these patients waited more than 14 days.OIG reviewed have identified multiple types of scheduling practices that are not in compliance with VHA policy. Since the multiple lists we found were something other than the official EWL, the additional lists may be the basis for allegations of creating “secret” wait lists.Secretary Shinseki called the find “reprehensible” and resigned from his post on May 30, 2014.Harrison, J. (2016). Essentials of strategic planning in healthcare. Health Administration Press: Chicago, IL.
Case Study Questions1. From a leadership perspective, analyze the problems at the VA relative to ethical decision making practices.
2. Discuss the ethical issue of having 1,700 veterans, who were not listed on the EWL, wait for a primary careappointment at the Phoenix VA. Create at least two (2) policies/standards to assure ethical leadershippractices for veterans on the EWL.
3. Explain why Secretary Eric Shinseki resigned his position. Identify at least two (2) alternative options for Mr. Shinseki to help resolve the unethical decision-making practices in this case study.
4. Apply the American College of Healthcare Executives (ACHE) Code of Ethics to the VA Health Systemcase study.
Requirements:● Please complete Assignment in a Microsoft Word document.● The body of your document should be at least 1500 words in length.● Quoting should be less than 10% of the entire paper. Paraphrasing is necessary.● Students must cite and reference at least 4 credible sources.● APA format is required.● For support access Kaplan Writing Center or Resources Documents found in Doc Sharing
Pease this paper should be 1,300- 1,500 words, strictly on topics, original, and well-detailed with 4 scholar APA references. No repeatation or grammer error. Read and follow all instructions and answer all questions accordingly.
NO PHARGIARISM!!!Hide Files: uk2qpxjr5d.docx, ssyecnndhe.pdf
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more